Is the Laplacian a vector or a scalar?

$\begingroup$

Need to prove $\operatorname{div}(\nabla u)=\nabla ^2 u$ where $u=g(x,y,z)$

The RHS is the Lapacian which we were told is a vector. But $\nabla u=(g_x,g_y,g_z)$ and the divergence of that is $g_{xx}+g_{yy}+g_{zz}$ which is not a vector. I don't get how it can equate then...

$\endgroup$ 6

2 Answers

$\begingroup$

The "Laplacian" is an operator that can operate on both scalar fields and vector fields. The operator on a scalar can be written,

$$\nabla^2 \{\} = \nabla \cdot (\nabla \{\})$$

which will produce another scalar field.

The operator on a vector can be expressed as

$$\nabla^2 \{\} = \nabla (\nabla \cdot \{\})\,\,-\nabla \times (\nabla \times \{\})$$

which will produce another vector field.

In Cartesian coordinates, both operators can be written

$$\nabla^2 \{\} = \frac{\partial^2 \{\}}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 \{\}}{\partial y^2}+\frac{\partial^2 \{\}}{\partial z^2}$$

where it is evident that operation on a scalar (vector) field transforms into a scalar (vector) field.

$\endgroup$ 5 $\begingroup$

Lapacian of an Nth Rank Tensor is another Nth Rank Tensor. This means Lapacian of a Scalar Field is another Scalar Field. Laplacian of Vector Field is another Vector Field and so on.

$\endgroup$ 2

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

You Might Also Like